And now that if it was it started? As we expected, our ministers of guardianship have continued to agitate despite summer heat, continuing on all fronts, the establishment of the university they want to impose.
A trip to the Official Journal is therefore (I), before blocking two important dates (among others) of the agenda returned (II).
I. A law, 7 orders, 3 arrested: heat the signature book!
a. Mobility Act officials.
pretext to introduce a human resources management more modern and efficient (in particular to facilitate the passage of a body or a public service to another), the Act provides that an officer whose position is Deleted will be "on call" without pay, or retirement, if he refuses three proposals for subsequent mutation. The text also controversy by authorizing the use of temporary staff in the state civil service and the territorial. Little by little, it is thus an essential part of the framework laid down by the Staff is challenged.
b. Decrees "Mastering and reform of teacher training."
These decrees were issued without waiting for the consultation to be announced by Luc Chatel at the end of August. If this new organization of the training must be "negotiated "What is the meaning of the six decrees, if not to make irreversible process of radical transformation that we unanimously rejected in the past four months of conflict university?
Clearly, negotiation is strictly controlled. Indeed, decrees, which sometimes borders on the drafting of indigence, fix certain elements of "reform." It is expected that the contest is open to four-year validated, after the M1 (which excludes can take the examination before the start of M2, including mere eligibility).
Regarding the certification, the text states that "may arise to external competition: 1 Candidates justifying, at the closing date of registration records, a master's or equivalent degree or diploma recognized by the Minister of Education, 2 ° The members who have, at the closing date of registration records, which they are enrolled in the final year of study towards obtaining a master's or equivalent degree or diploma recognized by the Minister of Education; 3 Applicants who have or have had the quality framework as defined in the collective labor agreement to which they belong or to whom they reported, justifying, on the date of close of business registration, five years professional practice carried on their quality framework. To be listed in the corps of teachers certified, candidates mentioned in 2 of I have passed the tests of open competition must prove, as well as the candidates mentioned in 1, a master or title or equivalent degree recognized by the Minister of Education. Those who can not justify such certificates or diplomas at the back of their success in the competition keeps the profit of it until the next school year. Then if they show one of these qualifications, they can be appointed as for probationers. Otherwise, they lose the benefit of the competition and can not be named. " The aggregate
will in turn hold a master 2 to take the examination, and not just the old master.
Nothing has changed aspects of the reform were rejected. Instead, the text confirms the fact that, whereas before students passed a diploma and competitions, they must now move at the same time diplomas and competitions, where intractable issues of definition of each other and their common weakness futures.
Furthermore, there is no mention of IUFM regards the internship year winners of the contest: the ancient text reads: "teachers ... Students are subject to a probationary period of one year during which they receive initial training in the university institutes of teacher training. The course is assessed in accordance with procedures established by a decree of the Minister for Education, "becomes:" The course has a duration of one year. During their internship, trainee teachers receive training provided, within the guidelines set by the state, in the form of shares held in the university, tutoring, and, where appropriate, other types of accompanying measures. The terms and conditions of the course of this assessment are determined by the Minister for Education. " The decree is thus particularly vague and leaves your hands completely free to the ministry. Questions about the future of IUFM like that of masters are therefore raised.
The texts are available on the site
SLU.
addition to these texts, the Government has published a series of decrees and orders that reinforce the drift presidentialist of LRU, the imbalances it creates and the logic of competition between wild individuals and institutions it promotes.
c. Order the partial mobility between public research bodies and universities: the management rotation Pécresse sauce.
Decree No. 2009-994 of 20 August 2009 amending Decree No. 2001-935 of 11 October 2001 establishing a mobility premium to higher education teaching for research managers and Order of August 20, 2009 amending the Decree of 11 October 2001 fixing the rate of the mobility premium to higher education teaching established for research managers
The possibility of graduate courses to university researchers for a premium raises the question of closer association of the covert researcher and teacher-researcher and, more importantly, says nothing can take the forms that the organization of mobility lessons: who takes the initiative? asking? who accepted the nomination? Is it a right open to researchers? What is the relationship between the needs of the training map and the proposed course? under what procedures? from which budget the premium it would come (university, CNRS)?
d. Presidential Management arbitrary careers? Too big to be true?
Order of July 27, 2009 on delegation of authority for recruitment and management of university professors and lecturers (released August 4, 2009 in Official Gazette).
Is this a purely technical delegation of signature or give university presidents the power to decide all acts relating to the careers of academics? Depending on the acts concerned, this order may be seen as falling into one category or another. All acts of scientific management, Teaching and pay teachers and researchers now depend on the sole signature of the president. But the text is terse and incomplete: it contains no details on ways and means available to a teacher-researcher in case of refusal to sign certain presidential actions. It seems to offer the state a power to the presidents of considerable nuisance on careers.
e. The benchmark equivalency hours: all power to HRD?
Order of July 31, 2009 (published in Official Gazette of August 14) approving the national framework of equivalences schedules.
He opens the door to differential treatment by the universities, their financial and human resources. He introduced into the university a favorite weapon of MEDEF for "alégaliser" social relations: the charter.
It is stated that the charter (which itself organizes packages declination) is "developed by the institution," without elaborating. However, Article 3 of the Decree states that "the Executive Director of Human Resources is responsible for the implementation of this Order." Should we therefore understand that HRD is now in control of the evaluation of all activities and responsibilities outside interference by the central council? The mention of an intervention of the CA in one case (basic minimum package of coaching course) tends to prove that, conversely, the CA is not involved in fixing those packages that would fall exclusively on the HRD.
All classes of landfills schedules envisaged by the text (except the compensation of university presidents, which is based on a national reference!) Will be determined within each university on the basis of a package. The text provides for each university institution 34 to 36 different packages depending on the activities, each package to consider appropriate disciplinary differentiations, or at least a grid covering all situations.
The repository also contains a number of devices pernicious: in particular the premiums for "supervising theses" which are based on the number of theses, landfills "large equipment" according to the size of the technical and attendance equipment.
Finally, the repository does not always mention the landfills under central affiliation boards.
II. The minimum agenda for the fall.
a. 30 September: meeting of the EAD at the University Paris 8
The first meeting of the National Coordination of Universities is crucial: the first appointment of the group must return at once to show the department intact and our determination to give a signal the academic community. These mean that we will not remain motionless due to the plethora of bad shots and that we do not limit ourselves to analyze, reflect and regret our mistakes or hesitations. It is essential that the greatest possible number of universities are represented that day and that these representations are legitimately from the first general meeting of the academic year.
b. October 10: General Assembly SLU
This meeting will take stock of the work of the association, to consider the terms of the further actions and strategies to implement. The motion analysis of spring and the role that universities can still play our association in the high school movement will hold a key (on this point, we refer to the text
SLU published last July). It is also the time discuss the modalities of action and preferred ways to thwart the implementation of the reform of training and recruitment of teachers in primary and secondary schools.
It is important that as many of us that day, we are members of SLU, "supporters" or colleagues wish to discuss the situation in higher education and research. Is the development of future directions, the very future of the association but it is also and above all, give this event the role of an important step in pursuing our common struggle.
Come to these two appointments!
You can join
SLU before or after October 10:
Together, we will not!