Where To Buy Deworming Medicine For Dogs

Open response to the invitation of Minister VALERIE PECRESSE - October 22

Under the 2009 winners of the European Research Council,

Valerie Pécresse Minister of Higher Education and Research beg you to kindly attend the cocktail reception to be held on

October 22, 2009 at 19 am in Room Hubert Curien

21 rue Descartes - 75231 Paris Cedex 05

RSVP

Madam Minister,

Thank you for your invitation to attend the cocktail you organize by honor the winners of the European Research Council (European Research Council, ERC) which will take place October 22.

I will not attend this cocktail, one of whose goals is obviously to celebrate the "trees that hide the forest", even though the reforms that you implement decimate the trees of these forests. How to celebrate the quality of French research, when the official speeches openly despise the researchers? If you think, Madam Minister, as research progresses only through a limited number of researchers "excellent," I regret to tell you that you are mistaken: the search is, in essence, a collective work, Long term, in which all stakeholders play a role fundamental research technician at winning. The government to which you participate, and you even defend a strongly hierarchical, pyramidal organization of research, where only those at the top of the pyramid have citizenship. It is easy to see that even those who, according to this view that I disagree, stand atop the pyramid there are maintained by the mass of those who are below the "poor" (since not excellent) d Based on your criteria. Remove these "mediocre", and your entire pyramid collapses, rushed ashore "excellent."

For centuries, scientists define as `` peer'', that is to say, equal, and the notion of hierarchy, with "good" and "bad", was never part of the academic vocabulary. That's politics that brought these designs in the world of research in order to apply a management managerial and entrepreneurial. But research is not and should not become a business, because it is intended, not profit, but the advance of knowledge for the good of humanity.

Methinks, Madam Minister, you and many others in government, confuse the concepts of excellence and elitism. There is no doubt, neither I nor the vast Most of my colleagues, that scientific research must strive for excellence, not least because we're funded by public funds from the tax, and that, more than any other yet, this money must be used wisely for the high-level research. Moreover, contrary to official rhetoric, the French research need not be ashamed of its quality: the example of the "ERC Starting Grants" is that you want to celebrate this very informative perspective: France ranks second at European level in terms of winners in all disciplines, and first in the life sciences. That said, on January 22 last, the research French was of poor quality? European experts say in all cases clearly the opposite.

But this is not the excellence that is promoted today, it is elitism, which is very different. In this elitist is fixed arbitrarily, that only a certain percentage of projects (or researchers or teams etc ...) should be supported and funded. No matter that those who are just below the bar are, also, "excellent": they are not quite good (you will agree that this concept of "good but not enough" to say the least " strange ") to receive the laurels of glory. They will therefore remain without funding, or nearly, and will not be invited to your "cocktail" of congratulations. How many research projects, excellent, have been delayed or abandoned due to lack of means?

You will understand, Madam Minister, I can not agree to play for you, the glittering showcase of research that despise your reforms. I do not accept that my success is used, punctual, to forget that French research is undermined. I can accept being used to promote elitism which hinders the development of many excellent researchers and projects.

Sincerely,

Boris BURLE,

Winner ERC Starting Grant,

CNRS Researcher in Fight in Fight in a Laboratory

Period Dark And Mucus

Press National Coordination of the 12th Universities

release of the 12th National Coordination of Universities, held at the University Paris 8 - St Denis September 30, 2009.

We still have more reasons to be angry and beat us last year. In convening this

September 30 a new National Coordination of Universities in struggle, we reaffirm our rejection of the law LRU that for two years, the government seeks to impose on us. The reasons for our involvement persist, the discontent of all components of the university community that has remained as it was launched in February 2009 where there has been the watchword of the University stop. The maintenance of the National Coordination of universities struggle brings together a first denied the propaganda efforts orchestrated by the Ministry of Higher Education and Research. The CNU continues to denounce the reform violates strongly the idea that we're doing the missions of the university, which undermines the utility of education Higher beyond research and beyond, contributing to the dismantling of national education. The CNU

reiterates his claims of past semester and calls in the immediate future:

- organizing AG in universities with the mandated election CNU , meetings and interprofessional

- to fight against the LRU law refusing passage to NCE, the sale of real estate and additional hours;

- to fight the logic of human resource management applied to university and research, based on the ideology of individual assessment (premiums individualized interviews BIATOSS professionals, service module), a situation aggravated by the law known as "mobility" of staff voted this summer

- refuse to degradation of training and recruitment of teachers in primary and secondary levels by blocking the development and uplift of the models' careers in teaching, whether in the form of specialty reference or route, denouncing the dangers of transitional measures refusing to apply the new methods of training.

To ensure the convergence of these various modes of resistance, to remind the department that the disapproval of his policy is widely shared by members of the university community to promote democracy in our institutions, to defend the status of officials for all those working to defend the existence of a university open to all and supports the integration of young researchers and PhD students, the National Coordination of Universities struggle will continue its efforts in collaboration with trade unions, associations and societies involved in this process.

We call a national day of demonstrations on November 17 and the 13th CNU October 27 (Paris IV or X?)



Reminder - Oct. 3: Coordination BIATOSS ( House of Unions, Paris 6)

- October 7: Labor Day decent

- 10 October: AG of SLU in Paris 7 (site Olympiad)

- 17 October: Meeting of the learned societies on reforms current (Institute Poincare )

- Week of October 22: Call for debate on the ongoing reforms in universities

- Oct. 27: next CNU

Install A Grill Guard

premere The motion of refusal to back the CAPES models this year (and it will not last)

Meeting Thursday, October 1, 2010, the Council of UFR studies Iberian and Latin American University of Paris-Sorbonne adopted unanimously the following motion:

We refuse the establishment of Masters professional education for prospective candidates to CAPES and we do not go back up on the comp.

Whatever form used for the framing of this new type of Masters, they would render the inevitable creation of a huge pool of "glued received" no credible professional perspective, would affect the short term the existence of competition and also that of current-research masters , denied the majority of their students.

is why the Board of Faculty already put in place a committee to consider a redevelopment Master of Romance Studies so better training of students according to their various professional projects: CAPES, aggregation, Ph.D., outlets turned to the business world. It's the only way to preserve both the interests of students and those of the University.

We invite all UFR to adopt the same position.